January 10, 2008
Greenville Vote Discrepancy SAME as Sutton
By AnalogDan | January 9, 2008
We have caught Sutton red-handed. However, there are other other tonwships that have been reporting 0 votes, including Greenville, as sourced here:
cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/county
Moreover, when Sutton had been found out, they quickly added 31 votes, and cited ‘human error.’ What is their excuse for this source, now showing Greenville at 25 votes:
Ladies and gentlemen, this is a pattern. Let’s get this info out ASAP. ronpaulwarroom.com
#5 corvax22 Says:
January 9th, 2008 at 2:04 pmHERE ARE THE LINKS TO SCREEN SHOTS OF VERY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY NOTICE THE TIME MY COMPUTER IN RELATION TO THE VOTE COUNTS. DOVERS TOTAL VOTE COUNT GOES DOWN BY TEN AFTER THE 6TH OF 6 STATION REPORTS IN. ALSO CHECK OUT KEENE AND NASHUA NUMBERS. ALL LINKS ARE LABELED BY CITY I HAVE OTHER SCREEN SHOTS JUST NOT SURE IF THIERS ANYTHING ON THEM I’LL WORK ON GETTING THEM ALL UP SOON.
OOPS CLOSED THAT LAST POST BEFORE I WAS FINISHED
IN THE NASHUA POST AT 9:43 RON PAUL VOTES DROP TO 30 FROM 745 ANYHOW JUST LOOK THROUGHT THE SCREEN SHOTS BY CORRELATING THE CITY NAME IN URL THEN TIME STAMPS YOU’LL SEE WHAT I’MA TALKING ABOUTPLEASE EVERYONE VIEW THIS BULLSH**
http://i228.photobucket.com/al…..00-pst.jpg
http://i228.photobucket.com/al…..810pst.jpg
http://i228.photobucket.com/al…..43-PST.jpg
http://i228.photobucket.com/al…..59-pst.jpg
http://i228.photobucket.com/al…..57-pst.jpg
http://i228.photobucket.com/al…..38-pst.jpg
http://i228.photobucket.com/al…..ver6-6.jpg
http://i228.photobucket.com/al…..r5-6-1.jpg
http://i228.photobucket.com/al…..ver5-6.jpg










