November 15, 2006
Dawkins (Darwin) versus Science
Why would a professional atheist, Richard Dawkins, denounce modern science in favor of antique science such as Darwin’s outdated incomplete theory? Why would he in turn, be so closed minded and dogmatic as the fundamentalist he routinely chastises? This is a man that claims to herald science as the pursuit of truth, yet he has been hoodwinked on such issues as 9/11. How can anyone claim to be semi intelligent and not question such obvious myths as the pancake theory or that cave dwellers orchestrated the greatest hoax in our modern era? It is evident he has no grasp of the complexities of the middle eastern conflict. Why is he so angry when he is wrong? Why does he cherry pick fools to debate? It all seems suspicous to me. Surely someone as closed minded as Dawkins would have been in the “flat earth” camp. You be the judge. (also watch Unlocking The Mystery of Life, below)
The God Delusion (or Dawkin’s Ego Festival)
00:47:51
Unlocking The Mystery Of Life **best watched after the above video, The God Delusion**
01:07:05










